KopKen.Nederlands ↗

Sources & further reading

Follow the
questions further.

Books, papers and classic texts connected to our essays, paradoxes and thought experiments.

Start with a question, browse a theme or follow a reading route. Our notes explain why a source is worth reading and where its limits lie. We also include work that challenges the ideas we explore.

English reading notes. Original publications in their available languages.

Publication details and links are reproduced from the shared KopKen catalogue. These English notes are AI-assisted editorial adaptations of the Dutch notes, not a new independent review of every full text. Missing bibliographic details are marked as not recorded.

The reading library

A place to start. Room to go further.

208 sources · 9 themes · 20 starting points

Routes overlap. A source can belong to more than one route. “Article” describes a record type, not a quality rating. Reset filters

208 sources found · page 10 of 12

205 of 208 English notes match this catalogue edition

Perspective

Goodwill needs a Power Grid

English note awaiting review

This source is new or its catalogue record has changed. The previous English note is withheld until it has been checked against the updated record. The source itself remains available.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Goodwill needs a Power Grid

Author(s): Sven Franken · Year: Not recorded

Publication / host: Sven Franken — persoonlijke website
Source language: English

KP-R-d0aada94a50c3dd1

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

Understanding Simpson's paradox by asking about causes

Pearl explains why aggregated figures also require thinking about possible causes and their relationships.

Why read it?

Explores the move from a surprising statistical pattern to an explanation.

Keep in mind

How figures should be adjusted depends on the research question and causal assumptions.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Comment: Understanding Simpson’s Paradox

Author(s): Judea Pearl · Year: 2014

Publication / host: Informa UK Limited
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2014.876829

KP-R-D1E26320C425

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

Block: a world of inverted colours

Block's thought experiment examines the relationship between our environment, the functions of mental states and how they feel.

Why read it?

Develops the question of whether the same functions can accompany different experiences.

Keep in mind

The imagined world serves a philosophical argument. It is not an observed situation.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Inverted Earth

Author(s): Ned Block · Year: 1990

Publication / host: JSTOR
Source language: English

DOI: 10.2307/2214187

KP-R-D1EF23704296

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

The inverted spectrum and relationships between colours

Clark examines whether the structure of colour relationships constrains the idea of two people having inverted colour experiences.

Why read it?

Helps examine the inverted spectrum beyond a single isolated colour.

Keep in mind

The article discusses a philosophical thought experiment. It does not directly observe anyone's inner experience.

Reference details

Title as recorded: SPECTRUM INVERSION AND THE COLOR SOLID

Author(s): Austen Clark · Year: 1985

Publication / host: Wiley
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-6962.1985.tb00413.x

KP-R-D217D20EF449

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

How companies present AI in human terms

This analysis examines how AI companies attribute human characteristics to systems and thereby shape expectations and power relations.

Why read it?

Helps examine how descriptions of AI influence our understanding of it.

Keep in mind

The article interprets communication. It does not test AI consciousness.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Constructing AI power: anthropomorphising imaginaries of generative AI by AI companies

Author(s): Anastasia Glawatzki · Year: 2026

Publication / host: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1007/s00146-026-03367-1

KP-R-D27EE286F4C5

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

Establishing understanding in a conversation with a language model

Research on how conversational partners check shared understanding and repair misunderstandings when a language model participates.

Why read it?

Explores how we can tell whether a conversational partner is responding to what we mean.

Keep in mind

The study assesses particular conversational tasks. A successful conversation does not, by itself, prove human-like understanding.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Establishing Conversational Grounding

Author(s): Biswesh Mohapatra; Manav Nitin Kapadnis; Laurent Romary; Justine Cassell · Year: 2024

Publication / host: Association for Computational Linguistics
Source language: English

DOI: 10.18653/v1/2024.emnlp-main.545

KP-R-D2EFF97C5122

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

The same argument, labelled as AI-generated

Zhu and colleagues examine how an “AI-generated” label affects assessments of a text.

Why read it?

Helps distinguish a text's origin from the quality of its reasoning.

Keep in mind

The study uses a particular design. The presumed author does not automatically determine whether an argument is sound.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Hetzelfde argument, een AI-label

Author(s): Not recorded · Year: Not recorded

Publication / host: aclanthology.org
Source language: English

KP-R-D34DA86B0665

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

Can AI be an authority on knowledge?

Hauswald examines what it means to treat an artificial system as an epistemic authority.

Why read it?

Explores why we might accept a system's answer.

Keep in mind

The article makes a philosophical assessment. Having authority and giving correct answers are not the same thing.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Artificial Epistemic Authorities

Author(s): Rico Hauswald · Year: 2025

Publication / host: Informa UK Limited
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1080/02691728.2025.2449602

KP-R-D3FF6A5D7487

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Perspective

Motte-and-bailey: retreating to a weaker claim

Shackel explains how someone may defend a disputed position by temporarily adopting a narrower, more defensible claim.

Why read it?

Helps identify shifts in a position during discussion.

Keep in mind

This is an essay by the author. Naming the pattern does not replace examining the particular reasoning.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Motte-and-bailey nader uitgelegd

Author(s): Not recorded · Year: Not recorded

Publication / host: blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk
Source language: English

KP-R-D41ECE9E03BE

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

Kripke on truth and self-reference

Kripke develops a formal theory of truth and self-referential statements, such as those in the liar paradox.

Why read it?

Offers further reading on what happens when a statement says something about itself.

Keep in mind

The text requires knowledge of logic. Its solution belongs to this approach and is not a universally accepted final answer.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Kripke: een theorie van waarheid

Author(s): Not recorded · Year: Not recorded

Publication / host: www.impan.pl
Source language: English

KP-R-D46C2380E698

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

AI and humanity's place

A philosophical reflection on AI as a possible shift in how people understand their own central place.

Why read it?

Invites examination of the stories we tell about AI and ourselves.

Keep in mind

The author makes a historical and philosophical comparison. The account is not an established future scenario.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Artificial Intelligence as the Fourth Decentering Revolution: From Cosmic, Biological, and Psychological Displacement to Cognitive Decentering

Author(s): Erik Cambria; Rui Mao; Nicola Bianchi; Amir Hussain; Keith Oatley; Geoffrey Hinton · Year: 2026

Publication / host: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1007/s12559-026-10569-8

KP-R-D55FEF795F5A

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Practice-based article

Accessible help in a digital world

A practice-based article on accessibility, freedom of choice and responsibility as support services become more digital.

Why read it?

Helps consider digital services from the perspective of someone seeking help.

Keep in mind

The article concerns a particular service context. It does not assess every current AI system.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Toegankelijke hulp in digitale tijden

Author(s): Not recorded · Year: Not recorded

Publication / host: sociaal.net
Source language: Dutch

KP-R-D615D51CFC9E

Open source (Dutch; new tab) ↗
ArticleCounterpoint

Statistical criticism of Dunning–Kruger

Gignac and Zajenkowski examine how much of the familiar self-assessment pattern can be explained by statistical effects.

Why read it?

Offers a counterpoint to overly simple explanations of the Dunning–Kruger effect.

Keep in mind

The article contributes to an ongoing debate. Read the original study and responses to this critique too.

Reference details

Title as recorded: The Dunning-Kruger effect is (mostly) a statistical artefact: Valid approaches to testing the hypothesis with individual differences data

Author(s): Gilles E. Gignac; Marcin Zajenkowski · Year: 2020

Publication / host: Elsevier BV
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2020.101449

KP-R-D659DD25DF01

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

Jevons revisited: does greater efficiency reduce consumption?

Sorrell examines evidence that greater energy efficiency can nevertheless increase total consumption.

Why read it?

Explores when additional use offsets efficiency gains.

Keep in mind

Additional use does not always cancel the entire saving. Its scale depends on the level of analysis and economic circumstances.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Jevons’ Paradox revisited: The evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency

Author(s): Steve Sorrell · Year: 2009

Publication / host: Elsevier BV
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.003

KP-R-D710C9FCF509

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Reference workStarting point

Recognising fallacies without labelling people

An extensive overview of fallacies and the importance of an argument's context.

Why read it?

Provides reference material for careful examination of arguments.

Keep in mind

Assessing an argument requires examining the reasoning, even when you recognise a fallacy's name.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Drogredenen herkennen zonder etikettenplakken

Author(s): Not recorded · Year: Not recorded

Publication / host: iep.utm.edu
Source language: English

KP-R-D7938D0306FA

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Guidance

Registered Reports: reviewing research before the results

A publication format in which the research question and method are reviewed before the results are known.

Why read it?

Shows how assessment of a research approach can depend less on an attractive outcome.

Keep in mind

This format reduces certain publication incentives. Research errors can still occur.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Registered Reports: de vraag beoordelen vóór de uitkomst

Author(s): Not recorded · Year: Not recorded

Publication / host: www.cos.io
Source language: English

KP-R-D7C08587C03C

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

Do we see the same colours?

Palmer examines the relationship between colour structure and conscious experience in the inverted-spectrum debate.

Why read it?

Explores how much we can know about one another's colour experience.

Keep in mind

The article contributes to a theoretical debate. It does not establish that two people's experiences can be directly compared.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Color, consciousness, and the isomorphism constraint

Author(s): Stephen E. Palmer · Year: 1999

Publication / host: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x99002216

KP-R-DB2BC1ED6B90

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

Why we prefer choices with known probabilities

A review of sixty years of research on decisions with unclear probabilities.

Why read it?

Provides wider background on Ellsberg's paradox and responses to ambiguous probabilities.

Keep in mind

The picture depends on which publications were selected and how they were analysed.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Ambiguity aversion: bibliometric analysis and literature review of the last 60 years

Author(s): Christoph Bühren; Fabian Meier; Marco Pleßner · Year: 2023

Publication / host: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1007/s11301-021-00250-9

KP-R-DBA198D2CDF2

Open source (English; new tab) ↗

How to use this library

Read the original source before relying on a specific claim. Our notes distinguish evidence, interpretation and illustration; they do not replace the source. A checked reference or working link is not a scientific quality certificate. Legal texts, historical examples and technical reports may need to be checked against newer versions.

Where a source has been corrected or a position is contested, read the connected response too. Links can lead to a full text, an abstract, a publisher's page or a paywall; access is not guaranteed.

Noticed an error? Contact KopKen and include the source identifier shown in its reference details.