KopKen.Nederlands ↗

Sources & further reading

Follow the
questions further.

Books, papers and classic texts connected to our essays, paradoxes and thought experiments.

Start with a question, browse a theme or follow a reading route. Our notes explain why a source is worth reading and where its limits lie. We also include work that challenges the ideas we explore.

English reading notes. Original publications in their available languages.

Publication details and links are reproduced from the shared KopKen catalogue. These English notes are AI-assisted editorial adaptations of the Dutch notes, not a new independent review of every full text. Missing bibliographic details are marked as not recorded.

The reading library

A place to start. Room to go further.

208 sources · 9 themes · 20 starting points

Routes overlap. A source can belong to more than one route. “Article” describes a record type, not a quality rating. Reset filters

208 sources found · page 2 of 12

205 of 208 English notes match this catalogue edition

Article

Giving datasets a factsheet

A proposal for documenting where a dataset comes from, what it contains and what it is intended for.

Why read it?

Sets out questions to ask about data before using it.

Keep in mind

Completing a description does not guarantee that the data are representative or suitable for a particular purpose.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Datasheets for datasets

Author(s): Timnit Gebru; Jamie Morgenstern; Briana Vecchione; Jennifer Wortman Vaughan; Hanna Wallach; Hal Daumé III; Kate Crawford · Year: 2021

Publication / host: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1145/3458723

KP-R-12B69AB3DCFF

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Classic text

Machiavelli on power and government

A historical English translation of Il Principe, discussing power, means and credibility.

Why read it?

Offers a historical starting point for questions about power, ends and the means used to pursue them.

Keep in mind

Read the passages in their political and historical context. Machiavelli writes from a particular perspective on power and government.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Machiavelli: The Prince

Author(s): Not recorded · Year: Not recorded

Publication / host: www.gutenberg.org
Source language: English

KP-R-12F7CB9D51EB

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

Thomson and the trolley problem

Thomson uses the trolley problem to examine moral differences between killing and letting someone die.

Why read it?

An original source for asking why seemingly similar choices can feel different.

Keep in mind

The thought experiments simplify the situation. They are not ready-made decision rules for real emergencies.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem

Author(s): Judith Jarvis Thomson; The Hegeler Institute · Year: 1976

Publication / host: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Source language: English

DOI: 10.5840/monist197659224

KP-R-13DE830B701B

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Preprint

Possible misuse of AI

Brundage and colleagues describe ways AI could be used maliciously and possible preventive measures.

Why read it?

Provides concrete scenarios for discussing human misuse of AI.

Keep in mind

The report dates from 2018. Its scenarios describe possibilities, not evidence that all of them will occur.

Reference details

Title as recorded: The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation

Author(s): Brundage, Miles; Avin, Shahar; Clark, Jack; Toner, Helen; Eckersley, Peter; Garfinkel, Ben; Dafoe, Allan; Scharre, Paul; Zeitzoff, Thomas; Filar, Bobby; Anderson, Hyrum; Roff, Heather; Allen, Gregory C.; Steinhardt, Jacob; Flynn, Carrick; hÉigeartaigh, Seán Ó; Beard, SJ; Belfield, Haydn; Farquhar, Sebastian; Lyle, Clare; Crootof, Rebecca; Evans, Owain; Page, Michael; Bryson, Joanna; Yampolskiy, Roman; Amodei, Dario · Year: Not recorded

Publication / host: arxiv.org
Source language: English

KP-R-14E0D91B4194

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
ArticleStarting point

The ironies of automation

Bainbridge shows why automation can place substantial demands on human expertise precisely when exceptional situations arise.

Why read it?

Explores what people need to remain able to do when systems take over routine work.

Keep in mind

The analysis was published in 1983. Applying it to generative AI also requires examining differences from those earlier systems.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Ironies of automation

Author(s): Lisanne Bainbridge · Year: 1983

Publication / host: Elsevier BV
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1016/0005-1098(83)90046-8

KP-R-159A6572D202

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Book

The psychology of information analysis

Heuer describes patterns and limitations in thinking when assessing incomplete information.

Why read it?

Offers ways to examine our own assumptions when evaluating information.

Keep in mind

The book was written for intelligence analysis. Its background matters when applying it elsewhere.

Reference details

Title as recorded: De psychologie van informatieanalyse

Author(s): Not recorded · Year: Not recorded

Publication / host: www.cia.gov
Source language: English

KP-R-19681A308C3C

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

What does “I'm not sure” do to our trust?

This study examines how people respond when a language model expresses uncertainty.

Why read it?

Encourages us to assess cautious-sounding AI answers on their substance.

Keep in mind

Cautious wording does not necessarily mean that the system accurately assesses its own reliability.

Reference details

Title as recorded: “I’m Not Sure, But…”: Examining the Impact of Large Language Models’ Uncertainty Expression on User Reliance and Trust

Author(s): Sunnie S. Y. Kim; Q. Vera Liao; Mihaela Vorvoreanu; Stephanie Ballard; Jennifer Wortman Vaughan · Year: 2024

Publication / host: www.microsoft.com
Source language: English

KP-R-1BEB6E9F2866

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

When explanations of AI advice help

A study of circumstances in which explanations accompanying AI advice reduce overreliance.

Why read it?

Explores which explanations help people assess AI advice for themselves.

Keep in mind

The effect depends on the task and on the effort the user makes to evaluate the explanation.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Explanations Can Reduce Overreliance on AI Systems During Decision-Making

Author(s): Helena Vasconcelos; Matthew Jörke; Madeleine Grunde-McLaughlin; Tobias Gerstenberg; Michael S. Bernstein; Ranjay Krishna · Year: 2023

Publication / host: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1145/3579605

KP-R-1C3739E50FD1

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
ChapterCounterpoint

Is “no true Scotsman” always a fallacy?

Anderson examines when someone changes the meaning of a category to evade criticism.

Why read it?

Helps assess shifting definitions carefully.

Keep in mind

The particular argument matters. Naming a fallacy is not enough to establish that it has occurred.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Is Flew’s No True Scotsman Fallacy a True Fallacy? A Contextual Analysis

Author(s): Robert Ian Anderson · Year: 2017

Publication / host: Springer International Publishing
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-57837-8_19

KP-R-1D3D71EEA730

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

Banach–Tarski: doubling a ball?

The original mathematical text on dividing and rearranging sets of points.

Why read it?

An original source for a paradox that challenges everyday ideas about space and volume.

Keep in mind

The proof concerns abstract sets and uses the axiom of choice. It cannot be used to double a physical ball of matter.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Sur la décomposition des ensembles de points en parties respectivement congruentes

Author(s): Stefan Banach; Alfred Tarski · Year: 1924

Publication / host: Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences
Source language: French

DOI: 10.4064/fm-6-1-244-277

KP-R-1E827DD630EC

Open source (French; new tab) ↗
Article

Thinking you knew it all along: does age matter?

This meta-analysis brings together research on age differences in hindsight bias: the feeling, after an outcome, that we saw it coming.

Why read it?

Explores how knowing the outcome can colour memory.

Keep in mind

Average differences between age groups do not tell us how an individual reasons.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Age differences in hindsight bias: A meta-analysis.

Author(s): Julia Groß; Thorsten Pachur · Year: 2019

Publication / host: American Psychological Association (APA)
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1037/pag0000329

KP-R-1EBCD4D9FFF7

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

Who checks AI within an organisation?

A proposal for auditing algorithmic systems within an organisation, from development through use.

Why read it?

Helps translate accountability for AI into concrete checks.

Keep in mind

These checks require access to information, expertise and follow-up. A documented approach alone is not enough.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Closing the AI accountability gap

Author(s): Inioluwa Deborah Raji; Andrew Smart; Rebecca N. White; Margaret Mitchell; Timnit Gebru; Ben Hutchinson; Jamila Smith-Loud; Daniel Theron; Parker Barnes · Year: 2020

Publication / host: ACM
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1145/3351095.3372873

KP-R-1F8EAF79A9F5

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

Probability errors in legal fact-finding

Dahlman organises common errors in using probability to assess evidence.

Why read it?

Shows why a convincing-sounding probability calculation can still mislead.

Keep in mind

The article discusses forms of reasoning. It does not advise on an individual case.

Reference details

Title as recorded: A systematic account of probabilistic fallacies in legal fact-finding

Author(s): Christian Dahlman · Year: 2024

Publication / host: SAGE Publications
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1177/13657127231209019

KP-R-207420A9BD6F

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

Can thinking extend beyond our heads?

Clark and Chalmers ask whether external tools can form part of our thinking.

Why read it?

Explores where our own thinking ends and a tool begins.

Keep in mind

This is a philosophical argument. It does not imply that every tool automatically becomes part of the mind.

Reference details

Title as recorded: The Extended Mind

Author(s): A. Clark; D. Chalmers · Year: 1998

Publication / host: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1093/analys/58.1.7

KP-R-21EA3BF21B7D

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Legislation

The GDPR and automated decisions

The official Dutch text of the GDPR, including Article 22 on decisions based solely on automated processing.

Why read it?

A primary legal source for questions about automated decision-making.

Keep in mind

Read the conditions and exceptions together. A single article does not necessarily establish what applies in a particular situation.

Reference details

Title as recorded: De AVG en geautomatiseerde besluiten

Author(s): Not recorded · Year: Not recorded

Publication / host: eur-lex.europa.eu
Source language: Dutch

KP-R-22151E3C0270

Open source (Dutch; new tab) ↗
Preprint

Searching where the light falls

Research into how available data influence what researchers and organisations discover.

Why read it?

Invites us to ask what we miss when we study only what is easy to measure.

Keep in mind

This is a preliminary research version. Its conclusions may change in a later version.

Reference details

Title as recorded: The Streetlight Effect in Data-Driven Exploration

Author(s): Johannes Hoelzemann; Gustavo Manso; Abhishek Nagaraj; Matteo Tranchero · Year: 2024

Publication / host: National Bureau of Economic Research
Source language: English

DOI: 10.3386/w32401

KP-R-22CB1C1B6EE0

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Classic text

Nietzsche: Ecce Homo

Nietzsche reflects on his work and approach to life, including ideas related to amor fati: affirming one's fate.

Why read it?

Provides background for questions about our relationship with our own lives and past.

Keep in mind

This is a literary and philosophical work, not a tested therapeutic approach.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Nietzsche: Ecce Homo

Author(s): Not recorded · Year: Not recorded

Publication / host: www.gutenberg.org
Source language: English

KP-R-230138C6408D

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

What students think others find normal

Prentice and Miller examine the gap between students' own views on drinking and the views they attribute to their group.

Why read it?

Shows how people may adapt to a group norm they have misjudged.

Keep in mind

The research concerns a particular campus setting. It cannot simply be used to describe another group.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm.

Author(s): Deborah A. Prentice; Dale T. Miller · Year: 1993

Publication / host: American Psychological Association (APA)
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.243

KP-R-2318B2135884

Open source (English; new tab) ↗

How to use this library

Read the original source before relying on a specific claim. Our notes distinguish evidence, interpretation and illustration; they do not replace the source. A checked reference or working link is not a scientific quality certificate. Legal texts, historical examples and technical reports may need to be checked against newer versions.

Where a source has been corrected or a position is contested, read the connected response too. Links can lead to a full text, an abstract, a publisher's page or a paywall; access is not guaranteed.

Noticed an error? Contact KopKen and include the source identifier shown in its reference details.