KopKen.Nederlands ↗

Sources & further reading

Follow the
questions further.

Books, papers and classic texts connected to our essays, paradoxes and thought experiments.

Start with a question, browse a theme or follow a reading route. Our notes explain why a source is worth reading and where its limits lie. We also include work that challenges the ideas we explore.

English reading notes. Original publications in their available languages.

Publication details and links are reproduced from the shared KopKen catalogue. These English notes are AI-assisted editorial adaptations of the Dutch notes, not a new independent review of every full text. Missing bibliographic details are marked as not recorded.

The reading library

A place to start. Room to go further.

208 sources · 9 themes · 20 starting points

Routes overlap. A source can belong to more than one route. “Article” describes a record type, not a quality rating. Reset filters

208 sources found · page 5 of 12

205 of 208 English notes match this catalogue edition

Article

When can someone be held responsible?

This philosophical analysis asks under what conditions someone can be held morally responsible when algorithms are involved.

Why read it?

Helps examine the conditions for responsibility before attributing it.

Keep in mind

The article investigates concepts and conditions. It does not establish fault in a particular case.

Reference details

Title as recorded: When responsibility cannot arise: algorithmic mediation and the preconditions of moral imputability

Author(s): Åke Elden · Year: 2026

Publication / host: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1007/s43681-026-01359-x

KP-R-4A78C9E1A447

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

Resistance to AI and room for independent judgement

A proposal for democratic, human-centred AI governance that examines relationships between people and systems.

Why read it?

Provides background for asking how much room people retain to challenge AI.

Keep in mind

The authors advocate a particular approach. The effectiveness of specific measures requires separate investigation.

Reference details

Title as recorded: AI resistance and epistemic agency: toward a relational framework for democratic and human-centered AI governance

Author(s): Faisal Saeed Malik · Year: 2026

Publication / host: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1007/s43681-026-01396-6

KP-R-4B91335E5EF1

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

Where does one colour end?

An experiment examines how vague colour boundaries and the order of observations influence colour naming.

Why read it?

Connects a philosophical question about vague boundaries with research on colour perception.

Keep in mind

The study concerns a particular perceptual task. It does not resolve the sorites paradox.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Vagueness and Order Effects in Color Categorization

Author(s): Paul Egré; Vincent de Gardelle; David Ripley · Year: 2013

Publication / host: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1007/s10849-013-9183-7

KP-R-4BA5DEA1BDB0

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Preprint

Taking AI welfare seriously?

An argument for investigating whether future AI systems could have interests that deserve moral consideration.

Why read it?

Offers a position to examine in the debate about possible AI consciousness and welfare.

Keep in mind

This is a contested position presented in a preprint. Read critiques that centre human interests alongside it.

Reference details

Title as recorded: AI-welzijn serieus nemen?

Author(s): Not recorded · Year: Not recorded

Publication / host: arxiv.org
Source language: English

KP-R-4EFF3313B254

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Research report

Algorithms as managers

An OECD report describes employers' accounts of using algorithms to organise and manage work.

Why read it?

Helps discuss how algorithms influence everyday working relationships.

Keep in mind

The survey captures employers' perspectives. It does not represent all workers or establish causal effects.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Algoritmisch management op het werk

Author(s): Not recorded · Year: Not recorded

Publication / host: www.oecd.org
Source language: English

KP-R-4F39642784F5

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

What language models know — and what we expect

This study compares what language models know with what people believe those models know.

Why read it?

Helps compare expectations of AI with its actual capabilities.

Keep in mind

The assessment concerns particular models and tasks. It is not a ranking that applies to every use.

Reference details

Title as recorded: What large language models know and what people think they know

Author(s): Steyvers, Mark; Tejeda, Heliodoro; Kumar, Aakriti; Belem, Catarina; Karny, Sheer; Hu, Xinyue; Mayer, Lukas W.; Smyth, Padhraic · Year: 2025

Publication / host: Nature Publishing Group
Source language: English

KP-R-4FBFE0D42B1C

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

Nietzsche on affirming your fate

Huddleston examines Nietzsche's amor fati: affirming one's own life and fate.

Why read it?

Offers further reading on our relationship with the past and our circumstances.

Keep in mind

This is a philosophical interpretation. Amor fati need not mean accepting harmful circumstances without criticism.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Nietzsche on Amor Fati

Author(s): Andrew Huddleston · Year: 2025

Publication / host: Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1515/agph-2024-0040

KP-R-502450F453B8

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

The paradox of the preface

Makinson asks how we can believe each statement in a book while expecting that the book contains an error somewhere.

Why read it?

Helps explore confidence in individual statements alongside doubt about the whole.

Keep in mind

The paradox concerns our capacity to be mistaken. It does not justify accepting contradictions without examination.

Reference details

Title as recorded: The paradox of the preface

Author(s): D. C. Makinson · Year: 1965

Publication / host: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1093/analys/25.6.205

KP-R-5186E96081E8

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Preprint

Investigating consciousness in AI

Butlin and colleagues draw on scientific theories of consciousness to investigate possible indicators of consciousness in AI.

Why read it?

Provides a way to make questions about AI consciousness more precise.

Keep in mind

The report proposes a research approach. The indicators do not, by themselves, prove consciousness.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness

Author(s): Butlin, Patrick; Long, Robert; Elmoznino, Eric; Bengio, Yoshua; Birch, Jonathan; Constant, Axel; Deane, George; Fleming, Stephen M.; Frith, Chris; Ji, Xu; Kanai, Ryota; Klein, Colin; Lindsay, Grace; Michel, Matthias; Mudrik, Liad; Peters, Megan A. K.; Schwitzgebel, Eric; Simon, Jonathan; VanRullen, Rufin · Year: Not recorded

Publication / host: arxiv.org
Source language: English

KP-R-53D192A3B77A

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

What can a test score tell us?

Kane describes how interpretations and uses of test scores need to be justified.

Why read it?

Helps look beyond a number when assessing knowledge and skills.

Keep in mind

The evidence needed depends on the decision the score will inform.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Validating the Interpretations and Uses of Test Scores

Author(s): Michael T. Kane · Year: 2013

Publication / host: Wiley
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1111/jedm.12000

KP-R-5469DEFB2251

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

Generative AI at work

A field study examines AI assistance in customer support and differences in outcomes between employees.

Why read it?

Explores who benefits from AI assistance and what people learn from it.

Keep in mind

The study concerns one working environment. Higher productivity does not, by itself, establish lasting expertise.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Generative AI at Work

Author(s): Erik Brynjolfsson; Danielle Li; Lindsey Raymond · Year: 2025

Publication / host: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjae044

KP-R-5512E42A8644

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

Thinking with people and tools

Hollan, Hutchins and Kirsh examine how cognitive work can be distributed across people and the tools they use.

Why read it?

Helps approach knowledge work as a shared activity.

Keep in mind

This perspective still requires investigating who knows and does what in each particular setting.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Distributed cognition

Author(s): James Hollan; Edwin Hutchins; David Kirsh · Year: 2000

Publication / host: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1145/353485.353487

KP-R-5630B5F0C3ED

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

Designing rewards and incentives thoughtfully

This review brings together ideas from economics, control theory and machine learning about influencing behaviour.

Why read it?

Provides background for asking why a well-intended reward can backfire.

Keep in mind

An incentive's effects need to be investigated in context. The familiar cobra anecdote serves, at most, as an illustration.

Reference details

Title as recorded: A Perspective on Incentive Design: Challenges and Opportunities

Author(s): Lillian J. Ratliff; Roy Dong; Shreyas Sekar; Tanner Fiez · Year: 2019

Publication / host: Annual Reviews
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1146/annurev-control-053018-023634

KP-R-568A8D4233F4

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

What Mary did not know

Jackson clarifies his argument about the difference between a complete description of an experience and having that experience.

Why read it?

Develops the thought experiment of Mary’s room.

Keep in mind

Read responses to the argument and the later text in which Jackson revises his position.

Reference details

Title as recorded: What Mary Didn't Know

Author(s): Frank Jackson · Year: 1986

Publication / host: Philosophy Documentation Center
Source language: English

DOI: 10.2307/2026143

KP-R-58231459DEEF

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

AI as a technology for knowledge

Alvarado discusses AI in terms of its role in acquiring, developing and assessing knowledge.

Why read it?

Helps describe more precisely the role AI takes in what we know.

Keep in mind

The article develops concepts. AI reliability needs to be investigated for each application.

Reference details

Title as recorded: AI as an Epistemic Technology

Author(s): Ramón Alvarado · Year: 2023

Publication / host: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Source language: English

DOI: 10.1007/s11948-023-00451-3

KP-R-599C6F4EF980

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Research report

NIST: assessing and managing AI risks

A public framework for identifying, assessing and managing AI risks.

Why read it?

Provides a structured way to ask questions about AI risks.

Keep in mind

The framework is voluntary. Using it is not a certificate or a guarantee of safety.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)

Author(s): Elham Tabassi · Year: 2023

Publication / host: National Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S.)
Source language: English

DOI: 10.6028/nist.ai.100-1

KP-R-5C70754E0C6C

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Classic text

Anattalakkhaṇa Sutta: what do we call a self?

An early Buddhist text on the self and different aspects of experience.

Why read it?

Offers another starting point for asking what we mean when we say “I”.

Keep in mind

This is an English translation from a religious and philosophical tradition. Read it with that background in mind.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Anattalakkhaṇa Sutta: wat noemen we een zelf?

Author(s): Not recorded · Year: Not recorded

Publication / host: www.dhammatalks.org
Source language: English

KP-R-5CC8DFFE629C

Open source (English; new tab) ↗
Article

Why employees stay silent

Morrison and Milliken examine how organisations can create conditions in which employees do not speak up.

Why read it?

Helps ask what knowledge and criticism an organisation never hears.

Keep in mind

The article develops a theoretical explanation. Silence can have several causes.

Reference details

Title as recorded: Organizational Silence: A Barrier to Change and Development in a Pluralistic World

Author(s): Elizabeth Wolfe Morrison; Frances J. Milliken · Year: 2000

Publication / host: Academy of Management
Source language: English

DOI: 10.2307/259200

KP-R-5F2F90F79386

Open source (English; new tab) ↗

How to use this library

Read the original source before relying on a specific claim. Our notes distinguish evidence, interpretation and illustration; they do not replace the source. A checked reference or working link is not a scientific quality certificate. Legal texts, historical examples and technical reports may need to be checked against newer versions.

Where a source has been corrected or a position is contested, read the connected response too. Links can lead to a full text, an abstract, a publisher's page or a paywall; access is not guaranteed.

Noticed an error? Contact KopKen and include the source identifier shown in its reference details.